![]()
ISSN 0974-3618 (Print) www.rjptonline.org
0974-360X (Online)
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Production and optimization of extracellular fungal
chitinase produced by Metarhizium anisopliae
(M.) Sorokin through Submerged and Solid State Fermentation
G. Narendrakumar*, S.
Karthick Raja Namasivayam, R. Arul luca sunder singh
Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Bio and Chemical
Engineering, Sathyabama University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
*Corresponding Author E-mail: gnaren22@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Chitinase,
one of the major metabolite produced by many organisms for the degradation of
chitin. Chitinases also play a role in
the utilization of waste from crustacean and other insects resulting in the
hydrolysis of chitin to its monomer N-acetyl-D-glucosamine. The
production of Chitinase can be enhanced by changing the constituents in the
medium. In present study chitin production from Metarhizium anisopliae isolated from the dead insect showed
production with different concentration of chitin in submerged media and solid
state fermentation using fish waste.
KEYWORDS: Chitin, Chitinase, Metarhizium
anisopliae, Submerged fermentation, Solid state fermentation.
INTRODUCTION:
Enzymes
are among the most important sequels obtained for human needs through plant,
animal and microbial sources. Many of the enzymes have the lot of applications
in industry, including food processing, brewery and baking1-4. Chitin forms the
exoskeleton of many invertebrates and is a major component of the cell wall of
fungi. There are enormous chitin result in environmental problem all round the
world. Different microorganism are
capable of producing chitinase that degrades chitin directly to
low-molecular-weight products. Almost all of the reported chitinase-producing
strains will use chitin or colloidal chitin as a carbon source. Chitinases –a
group of enzymes catalyse the hydrolysis of chitin to its monomer N-acetyl-D-Glucosamine.
Chitinases may find important industrial applications to the treatment of
chitin, especially derived from sea-food-processing units5-7.
Received on 13.02.2015 Modified on 28.02.2015
Accepted on 04.03.2015 © RJPT All right reserved
Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 8(3): Mar.,
2015; Page 280-284
DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2015.00047.5
Chitinases
are used extensively in biological research for the generation of fungal
protoplasts due to its ability to degrade fungal cell wall. The hydrolytic
property of chitinases makes it an attractive alternative as an environmentally
safe bio control agent. There are a variety of instances where chitinase
producing organisms are used to inhibit the growth of phytopathogens. Chitinase
is known to process diverse characteristics worthy of detailed enzymatic
studies related to their biological role and structural elucidation8-10.A
wide range of microorganisms are known to produce chitinase which have a lot of
industrial and environmental applications.Among the microbes,fungi play avital
role in chitinase production because of the ease of cultivation on a wide range
of media and high yield. Metarhizium anisopliae
(M.) Sorokin is an important fungal biopesticidal agent against economic
important pests. The fungal organism produces diverse metabolites during the
pathogenesis of the insects.[8].These entomopathogenic fungi produces extracellular chitinases
only during host penetration and degrade chitin. It has the ability to grow in wide range of pH5.
Solid
state fermentation (SSF) has grown importance recently in the production of
microbial enzymes obtaining economic advantages over conventional submerged
culture (SF). Several groups of microorganisms have been used in SSF,
especially the filamentous fungi that have been exploited for their abilities
to produce a wide range of extracellular enzymes and to grow on solid complex
substrates. Several enzymes including amylases, cellulases, pectinases,
proteases and glucoamylasas have been produced in solid state fermentation18-,21.
In
the present study, production and optimization of chitinase through submerged
and solid state fermentation by Metarhizium
anisopliae (M.) Sorokin was studied.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS:
Fungal strain
Chitinase
producing Metarhizium anisopliae was
used in the present study was isolated from dead larval instars of Spodopteralitura by the modified method
of Sahayaraj and Karthick Raja Namasivayam15.
The
identification of isolated fungi was performed by macroscopic (colony
morphology) and microscopic (conidia and conidiophores using a compound
microscope)8.
Inocula preparation
Fungal
inocula was prepared from Potato Dextrose Agar slant culture of M. anisopliae by scrapping the slant
with Tween 20 using glass rod. Slurry thus obtained was filtered through crude
filter paper, collected filtrate suspension was used as source of inocula
Chitinase production through submerged
fermentation
Production and optimization
Production of chitinase was
carried out by the modified method20.Five millilitre of fungal spore
suspension was inoculated into one litre of production media consist of
colloidal chitin at different concentration, peptone 1 g/l, MgSO4˙7H2O
1 g/l, (NH4)2SO42 g/l,K2HPO41g/l,
NaCl 1 g/l,. Inoculated flasks were incubated under shaking condition at 300
RPM for 48 hours. After the incubation period, the media was filtered through
cheese cloth to remove mycelia, filtered broth was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm
and collected filtrate was used for enzyme assay.
Optimization
Optimization of nutrient factors of chitinase production media was
studied by changing the compositions of chitin11-14.
Chitinase production through Solid state
fermentation
Estimation of Moisture
content
The sample was weighed along with moisture and recorded as “wet
weight of sample” Followed by the drying at 90oC using hot air oven
until the sample is dried. The sample was allowed to cool. The sample was
weighed again and recorded as the “dry weight of sample”
The moisture content of the sample is calculated using the
following equation:
![]()
Where: %W = Percentage of moisture in the sample, A = Weight of
wet sample (grams), and B = Weight of dry sample (grams)
Production and optimization
The cultures under Solid State Fermentation were obtained by
inoculating of 1 ml of spore suspension (105 spores/mL) on 4 g of
crushed fish waste as carbon source moistened with distilled water (Different
concentration), yeast extract solution (1% v/v), salt solution. After
incubation, the cultures were added with 50 ml of autoclaved distilled water15-17.
The free cell filtrate, identified as extracellular crude extract,
was dialyzed against distilled water at 4°C over-night and used for chitinase
activity determination8.
Analytical methods
Enzyme
assay
Monreal and Resse method18 was used to
determine chitinase enzyme quantification. The reaction mixture, which
consisted of 1.5 ml enzyme solution, 2.5 ml of 1 % colloidal chitin in 0.075 M,
pH 7 sodium phosphate buffer, was incubated at 50, 100 RPM for 10 min in a
water bath.
After the enzymatic reaction, 1 ml of DNS reagent (3, 5-dinitrosalicylic acid
10 g/l, phenol 2 mg/l, Na2SO30.5 g/l, and NaOH 10 g/l)
was added, followed by heating of the mixture at 100 for 5 min. Then the
solution was cooled for 5 min, diluted with l ml of distilled water, and
centrifuged at 3000 g for 15 min to remove the precipitate. The absorbance was
measured in a spectrophotometers at 540 nm. One unit (U) of enzyme activity was
defined as the amount of enzyme required to produce 0.5 μmol of N-acetyl-D-glucosamine
for 1 h.
RESULTS AND
DISCUSSION:
Identification:
Microbiological
analysis (macroscopic and microscopic analysis) was performed to characterize
the screened strain.
Macroscopic observation
Colonies
grow rather gradually on PDA and pigmentation ranging from light to dark yellow
diffusing into the medium. Conidia color may differ in colony size and
condition. After 7 days of incubation, the culture produces a white mycelial
margin with clumps of more or less verticillate branching conidiophores.
Microscopic observation
Conidial
chains were round, columnar phialides in a dense parallel arrangement, and
conidia were cylindrical to oval.
The
above Macroscopic and Microscopic observation suggest the isolated organism was
Metarhizium anisopliae.
Cynthia Barbosa Rustiguel et al 2012 8used Metarhizium anisopliae was used as the
culture organism for the production of chitinase. Many report suggest the usage
of fungi and bacteria for the production.
Effect of chitin:
Different concentration of chitin was inoculated in the minimal
media and the enzyme activity was calculated in different time intervals (12,
24, 36, 48, 60 and 72) (Table-1 & Figure -1). In the concentration of 5%
(w/v) the enzyme activity was comparatively higher than the other
concentrations. According to Mandana Zarei
et al., 20106expressed that the concentration of chitin was about 5%
in the medium where Serratia marcescens was cultivated for the production of chitinase.
Table 1: Effect of Chitin on
Enzyme Activity
|
S. No |
Concentration of chitin (%) |
Enzyme
activity (unit per ml) |
|||||
|
12 |
24 |
36 |
48 |
60 |
72 |
||
|
1 |
0.1 |
5.6 |
11.2 |
26.2 |
30.1 |
42.4 |
51.3 |
|
2 |
0.25 |
6 |
14.5 |
31.2 |
40.1 |
50.1 |
60.1 |
|
3 |
0.5 |
10 |
19 |
40.4 |
53.4 |
61.4 |
69.2 |
|
4 |
0.75 |
24 |
25 |
44.2 |
59.1 |
64.1 |
71.4 |
|
5 |
1 |
30.1 |
39.4 |
51.4 |
62.4 |
74.1 |
78.1 |
|
6 |
1.5 |
36.1 |
41.2 |
54.1 |
66.1 |
79.2 |
81.4 |
|
7 |
2 |
39.3 |
45.2 |
56.2 |
69.3 |
73.1 |
78.7 |
|
8 |
2.5 |
43.2 |
52.3 |
60.4 |
72.2 |
76.2 |
81.4 |
|
9 |
3 |
44.2 |
53.1 |
61.7 |
73 |
78.4 |
82.2 |
|
10 |
3.5 |
48.4 |
56.1 |
63.2 |
76.4 |
81.4 |
89.4 |
|
11 |
4 |
50.1 |
59.2 |
66.2 |
79.4 |
84.2 |
91.4 |
|
12 |
4.5 |
60.2 |
71.4 |
82.3 |
90.1 |
101 |
97.4 |
|
13 |
5 |
41.4 |
47.4 |
51.2 |
60.2 |
69.1 |
56.1 |
|
14 |
5.5 |
24.7 |
17.9 |
4 |
1.75 |
0.7 |
0.4 |
|
15 |
6 |
9.4 |
11.3 |
0.9 |
0.4 |
0.2 |
0.07 |

Figure 1.Theenzyme activity
in (IU/ml) in different concentration of chitin with respect to time in hours
Table 2: Effect of Solid State
Fermentation using Fish Cell Waste
|
S.NO |
Moisture content% |
Enzyme
activity (Unit per ml) |
|||||
|
12 |
24 |
36 |
48 |
60 |
72 |
||
|
1 |
0.0 |
9.1 |
24.5 |
32.4 |
41.1 |
49.0 |
53.1 |
|
2 |
1.0 |
9.5 |
21.0 |
30.5 |
40.4 |
47.4 |
49.2 |
|
3 |
2.5 |
10.6 |
11.2 |
32.2 |
38.1 |
47.4 |
54.3 |
|
4 |
5.0 |
9.2 |
19.3 |
28.4 |
38.3 |
43.4 |
46.4 |
|
5 |
7.5 |
8.7 |
13.4 |
24.4 |
32.4 |
39.1 |
41.1 |
|
6 |
10.0 |
3.2 |
11.2 |
14.1 |
16.1 |
9.2 |
3.4 |
|
7 |
12.5 |
1.0 |
4.2 |
6.2 |
8.3 |
4.1 |
1.7 |
|
8 |
15.0 |
0.05 |
1.01 |
2.02 |
2.53 |
0.09 |
0.07 |
|
9 |
17.5 |
0.05 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
1.90 |
0.08 |
0.07 |
|
10 |
20.0 |
0.05 |
0.07 |
0.09 |
1.02 |
0.07 |
0.06 |
|
11 |
22.5 |
0.03 |
0.07 |
0.09 |
1.00 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
|
12 |
25.0 |
0.03 |
0.05 |
0.06 |
0.05 |
0.03 |
0.03 |

Figure 2.The enzyme activity
in (IU/ml) in different moisture content with respect to time in hours
The effect of solid state
fermentation using fish cell waste:
The
fish waste was added with suitable moistening agents to meet the water
requirement and supplementary nutrients to the growing cultures. The Fig. 2 and
Table-2 shows that the maximum enzyme production of ranges from 10.6 – 54.3
IU/ml with respect to the time was obtained using salt solution and enzyme
secreation was subjective by the additional proportionate amount of mineral
ions.
The
cost-effective mechanism was needed for the production of enzyme and SSF is a
suitable technology for economical production of chitinase using chitin as
substrate.
CONCLUSION:
According to the present study, analyzed microorganisms exhibited
the highest chitinolytic activity in the presence of 5% chitin. The moisture
content for the solid state fermentation was determine the productivity of the
enzyme.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT:
The authors would like to thank the Management and Faculty of Bio
and Chemical Engineering, Sathyabama University, Chennai for their support.
REFERENCES:
1.
Abdel-Fattah Y. Optimization of thermo stable lipase
production from a thermophilic Geobacillus
sp. using Box–Behnken experimental design. Biotechnology
Letter. 2002;24: 1217–1222.
2.
Abel H, Marie D, Nathalie R, Danielle D, Louis S, Louis C.
Purification and characterization of an extracellular lipase from a
thermophilic Rhizopus oryzae strain
isolated From palm fruit. Enzyme
Microbial Technology. 2000;26:421–430.
3.
Canganella F, Andrade C, Antranikian G. Characterization of
amylolytic and pullulytic enzymes from
thermophilic archaea and from a new Ferividobacterium
species. Applied Microbiology
Biotechnology. 1994;42:239–245.
4.
Bertoldo C, Duffner F, Jorgensen P, Antrakianin G.
Pullulanase type I from Ferividobacteriumpennavorans VEN5:
cloning, sequencing, expression of the gene and biochemical characterization of
the recombinant enzyme. Applied
Microbiology Biotechnology.2012; 65:2084–2091.
5.
Keiko Shirai Matsumoto, Advances in
Agricultural and Food Biotechnology. Editors: Ramón Gerardo Guevara-González
and Irineo Torres-Pacheco; 2006.
6.
Mandana Zarei, Saeed Aminzadeh,
Hossein Zolgharnein, Alireza Safahieh, Ahmad Ghoroghi, Abbasali Motallebi,
Morteza Daliri, Abbas Sahebghadam Lotfi,, Serratia marcescens B4A
chitinase product optimization using Taguchi approach, Iranian journal of Biotechnology. 2010;8:424-484.
7.
Bergquist P, Love D, Croft J, Streiff M, Daniel R, Morgan H.
Cloning of genes involved in cellulose hydrolysis. In: Herbert., Sharp, R.
(Eds.), Molecular Biology and Biotechnology of Extremophiles. Chapman
and Hall, NY; 1992.
8.
Cynthia Barbosa Rustiguel, João Atílio Jorge, Luis Henrique
Souza Guimarães, Optimization of the Chitinase Production by Different Metarhiziumanisopliae Strains under
Solid-State Fermentation with Silkworm Chrysalis as Substrate Using CCRD, Advances in Microbiology,
2012;2:268-276.
9.
Carlsen M, Nielsen J, Jorgensen SB, Zangirolami TC. Growth
and enzyme production during continuous cultures of a high amylase-producing
variant of Aspergillus oryzae. Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 2002;19: 55–67.
10.
Patel B, Gohel V, Raol B. Statistical optimization of medium
components for chitinase production by Paenibacillussabina strain JD2. Annuals of Microbiology.
2007;57:589–597.
11.
Takayanagi T, Ajisaka K, Takiguchi Y, Shimahara K, Isolation
and characterization of thermostable chitinases from Bacillus lichiniformis
X_7u. Biochem. Biophys. Acta. 1991;
1078:404–410.
12.
Chen C, Adolphson R, Dean F, Eriksson K, Adamas M, Westpheling
J. Release of lignin from kraft pulp by a hyperthermophilicxylanase from Thermotogamaritema. Enzyme Microb. Technol.1997;20:39–45.
13.
De Mot R, Andries K, Verachtert H. Comparative study of
starch degradation and amylase production by Ascomycetes yeast species. Syst.
Appl. Microbiol. 1984;5:106–118.
14.
De Rosa M, Morana A, Riccio A, Gambacorta A, Trincone A, Incani O. Lipids of the archaea: a new
tool for bioelectronics. Biosens.
Bioelectr. 1994;9:669–675.
15.
Sahayaraj K, Karthick RNS, Mass
production of entomopathogenic fungi using agricultural products and by
products. African Journal of
Biotechnology. 2008;7: 1907-10.
16.
Tsujibo H, Endo H, Miyamoto K, Inamori Y. Expression in
Escherichia coli of a gene encoding a thermostable chitinase from Streptomyces
thermoviolaceus OPC-520. Biosci.
Biotechnol. Biochem. 1995;59: 145–146.
17.
Aloise PA, Lumme M, Aynes CA. N-Acetyl-d-Glucosamine Production from Chitin-Waste Using
Chitinases from Serratia marcescens,
In: Muzzarelli RAA, editor. Chitin enzymology, vol. 2.Italy:
Ncona, 1996;581–594.
18.
Monreal J, Reese ET. The Chitinase of Serratia marcescens,
Canadian
Journal of Microbiology,1969;15:689–696.
19.
Ulhoa CJ, Peberdy JF. Regulation of chitinase synthesis in Serratia marcescens. Journal
of General Microbiology, 1991;14:2163–9.
20.
Suresh PV, Chandrasekaran M. Utilization of prawn waste for
chitinase production by the marine fungus Beauveria
bassiana by solid state fermentation. World
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 1998;14:655–660
21. Rattanakit N,
Plikomol A, Yano S, Wakayama M, Tachiki T. Utilization of shrimp shellfish
waste as a substrate for solid-state cultivation of Aspergillus sp.S1-13:
Evaluation of a culture based on chitinase formation which is necessary for
chitin-assimilation. Journal of
Biosciences and Bioengineering. 2002; 93:550–556.